|
The Avocet
Home
|
Excerpts from the Fall 2006
Avocet
President's
Message
Tim Armstrong
We did it! Thanks to all of you who contacted your congressional
representatives concerning funding for the Baca National Wildlife Refuge.
Based on our request, Senator Allard has requested $324,000 for the
Baca for fiscal year 2007, which starts in October. The money, which
is for basic operations and maintenance, will allow the refuge to meet
some of its most pressing needs like replacing water control structures
and posting signs. Senator Allard's request made it through the Senate
Appropriations process and now the Senate's version of the budget must
be reconciled with the House's version.
That's the good news. The not so good news is that the money for the
Baca came as an "earmark" instead of an "add-on."
The difference between the two is that an add-on, which is what we requested,
is new money for the refuge system. Right now, there is not a lot of
"new" money in Washington as we continue to spend billions
in Iraq. An earmark is when a Congressman directs an agency to spend
money that is budgeted for one purpose on something else. In this case,
Senator Allard directed the US Fish and Wildlife Service to take $324,000
from its construction budget and use the money to fund the Baca instead.
I don't pretend to understand the intricacies of the federal budget
process, but my understanding is that once money is earmarked, it is
removed from an agency's budget in the next fiscal year. This is one
of the dangers of Friends groups. Like the old saying that "all
politics are local," most Friends groups are interested primarily
in their local refuges. But each time Friends groups lobby their Congressman
for earmarked money for "their" local refuges, the money is
then lost from the US Fish and Wildlife Service's budget. Opinions concerning
the impact of earmarked money differ however. Some argue that any money
for refuges is a good thing, but it seems to me that in the long term,
this process threatens the entire refuge system. In our Appropriations
request to Senator Allard, we specifically asked that any funding for
the Baca be in the form of an add-on instead of an earmark, but we had
no control over how Senator Allard requested the money. Our job next
year will be to continue to work on finding permanent funding to run
the Baca within the US Fish and Wildlife Service's budget, and to make
sure that the money that was provided for the Baca this year is not
removed from the US Fish and Wildlife Service budget.
Like virtually all federal agencies that manage our natural resources,
the US Fish and Wildlife Service's budget has not increased as they
have acquired additional lands to manage (like the Baca). The long-term
answer is to increase funding for natural resource management, but the
only way that this will happen is if we let our policy makers in Washington
know that this is a priority. One nice way to do this is to thank each
of our Congressional representatives for their help obtaining funding
for the Baca, and at the same time mention that conserving our country's
natural resources is important to you. We submitted our Appropriations
request through Senator Allard's office, but both Congressman Salazar
and Senator Salazar helped with the process.
You can email or call them via the Contact link on the following websites:
Senator Allard: allard.senate.gov
Senator Salazar: salazar.senate.gov
Congressman Salazar: www.house.gov/salazar
Closer to home, thanks again to all of volunteers who
worked for the refuges over the summer. Activities included cleaning
up the lawn around the Baca office buildings, staffing a booth at the
Rio Grande Watershed Kid's Water Festival, and painting signs for duck
nest transects, which is an ongoing project.

|
New Deputy Assistant
Refuge Manager
at San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuges

Clarke Dirks took over responsibilities as the Deputy Project leader
for the San Luis Valley complex of refuge's on August 21, 2006. Dirks
comes to the refuge with over 17 years of experience with the U. S.
Fish and Wildlife Service. After graduating in 1987 from Montana State
University with a bachelor's degree in Fish and Wildlife Management,
he began his career with temporary positions across the northern Great
Plains of Montana, and North Dakota. Dirks accepted his first Refuge
Management position in 1991, as Refuge Operations Specialist at Lake
Alice NWR in Devils Lake ND. From there he began a trek southward, moving
to the Assistant Manager position at Lacreek NWR in Martin, SD, then
accepting his first Refuge Manager position at Big Lake NWR in Manila,
AR. There Dirks met his wife of the last seven years Kim, before moving
to the Refuge Manager position at Reelfoot, and Lake Isom NWR's in Union
City, TN. Dirks then transferred to the Project Leader position at Piedmont
and Bond Swamp NWR's in Central Georgia.
Dirks feels the biggest asset he brings to the San Luis Valley is his
breadth to experience, and his ability to adapt to various habitat types
and issues. " I have worked with waterfowl for the majority of
my career, from production refuges in the Dakota's and Montana, to wintering
refuges in Arkansas and Tennessee, so providing nesting and migration
habitat within the San Luis Valley should come pretty naturally to me."
|
|
|
Duck Nest Transects:
Monte Vista NWR
By Kelli Stone, Refuge Biologist
The Monte Vista NWR is the site of one of the longest-running waterfowl
data sets in the country. "Duck Nest Transects" have been
conducted here for the last 42 years by biologists, managers, students,
and volunteers who walk approximately 167 miles through marsh, ditch,
and even greasewood at times, looking for duck nests. The purpose is
to document the number of duck nests and combined with subsequent counts
of ducklings (brood counts) get an estimate of number and species of
ducks produced on the refuge.
In 1961 the refuge's first wildlife biologist, Robert Ballou, tested
a variety of ways to search for duck nests. He determined that "transects"
which are lines either marked or unmarked, across the landscape where
a biologist systematically moves along and records information, were
the most effective. In 1964, 142 transects, running due north-south,
were established throughout the entire refuge. To walk all of these
~300 miles and look for nests took a tremendous amount of work and despite
the best recruiting efforts, it became too burdensome. In the early
1970's every other transect was removed. Since then refuge staff and
others have walked 71 transects, which is about 167 miles, each May
and June.
Each transect is marked by a linear series of tall poles
located every 0.5 mile that have yellow wooden signs with the transect
number painted on them. Using binoculars, the poles can be lined up,
marking the transect to walk. Biologists walk through everything that
is "on line"; including waist deep water, tall and almost
impermeable cattails, and sedge wetlands. Each walker looks for and
records data on all duck nests within 2.5 meters on each side of the
transect line. For each nest found duck species, number of eggs, age
of eggs, and characteristics of the surrounding vegetation is recorded.
Extreme care is taken to limit the disturbance to ducks and the surrounding
habitat. Nest location is marked at some distance away, to allow relocation
to determine the fate of eggs (hatched or destroyed). The transects
are all re-walked in June to determine the fate of May nests and to
locate nests of species that nest later in the season, such as gadwall.
In July the refuge biologist relocates and checks the fate of all nests
found in June.
From 1977 to 2000 the average number of nests located on transects was
109. Many nests go undetected, so the total number of nests found is
just an indication or index of the number of nests actually present.
During that same period the average number of ducks produced was about
15,000, quite a few ducklings! From 2000 to present the average number
of duck nests dropped to 31, primarily due to the drought and its impact
on wetland vegetation. Wetland conditions, however, are improving.
The wooden signs on the transect posts are weathering and many are falling
apart. The Friends started painting new signs this summer; they will
make about 250 of them which will then be available for volunteers and
others to post. We are very grateful for this help and "walking
the line" will be much easier next spring thanks to you!
If you would like to help with this on-going project please call Jenny
Nehring 852-3619.
|
|
Oil and Gas Drilling on the Baca NWR
Ron Garcia
Somewhere along the line of history on this incredible piece of land
called "The Baca Ranch" the property rights were severed leaving
the surface rights in one ownership and the subsurface rights (mineral
rights) in the hands of a different owner. In May of 2005 when the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) acquired the lands which make up
the Baca National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge), those portions of land associated
with the former "Baca Ranch" came only with the surface rights
attached. This situation is not new to the Service, in that there are
several refuges in the system with severed property rights.
In the case of the Baca Refuge, the owner of the mineral rights on lands
associated with the former Baca Ranch is Lexam Explorations Inc. (Lexam).
Lexam, a Canadian based investor, funded firm recently notified the
Refuge of it's intent to advance on what they call "The Baca Grant
Oil and Gas Project". Based on evaluation of data from previous
seismic surveys of the area, Lexam believes there are two prospect targets
beneath the Refuge which may have the potential to produce Oil and/or
Gas.
Oil and Gas (O&G) production on National Wildlife Refuges is also
not new to the Service. In fact, about one quarter of all refuges in
the Service's National Wildlife Refuge System (system) have past or
present oil or gas activity on them. Over 150 of the 575 refuges in
the system contain a total of over 4,400 oil/gas wells either active
or inactive. O&G activities on refuges occur not only when mineral
rights have been separated from surface property rights (similar to
the Baca NWR), but also in situations where the federal government owns
100% of the property rights.
On the Baca Refuge, Lexam has proposed the drilling of two exploration
wells on what they call "The Crestone East Prospect". They
believe this area, which is located along the willow creek drainage
of the Refuge, is well defined geologically. The plan is to drill the
two wells into identified target zones between 12,000 and 14,000 feet
below the surface. If these "Wildcat" wells produce gas or
oil, Lexam will convert and develop them as production wells. In addition,
Lexam is proposing to carry out a more intensive seismic survey encompassing
a larger area. With this they hope to better define their second prospect
which is currently known as the "The Crestone West Prospect"
and is located further to the west in the Wiseman Lake area of the Refuge.
Based on the results of the survey, which will incorporate ultra-modern
technology to produce 3D subsurface imagery, Lexam will decide if additional
drilling will be proposed.
O&G activity is, for the most part, new to the San Luis Valley,
and as a result there are several questions and concerns surrounding
it. Most concerns deal with the management and oversight of oil and
gas operations and their effects on the environment. To help get answers
to many of the questions being asked, the Refuge has organized a series
of public meetings.
In August of 2003 the Government Accountability Office (GAO), issued
the report National Wildlife Refuges: Opportunities to Improve Management
and Oversight of Oil and Gas Activities on Federal Lands. In this report,
the GAO pointed out shortcomings and inconsistencies within the system
in the Service's management and oversight of O&G exploration and
extraction activities on refuges.
Recently, the Service has taken several steps to improve O&G management
on refuges. Included are the creation of an Oil and Gas Management Handbook
(Draft, designed to provide appropriate technical, administrative and
legal information), the development of appropriate training specifically
designed for refuge managers, and the creation of a system-wide oil
and gas operation coordination position.
The Refuge has invited 1The Sonoran Institute to facilitate the meetings.
Jim Spehar, Director of The Sonoran Institute's Central Rockies Office
and a west slope resident with extensive experience working with communities
and oil and gas operators on Best Management Practices for Oil and Gas
Operations, will assist with the meetings. The first meeting was held
on August 9th and was used to outline the processes and get a general
feel for the types of concerns out there. A subsequent meeting scheduled
for Tuesday, September 12, 2006 at 6:30 p.m. at the Baca Property Owner's
Association Buildling in Crestone will feature representatives of Lexam
outlining their proposal and taking questions, in addition, the director
of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission will be present
to talk about the state's regulatory authority over oil and gas activities
in Colorado, and finally Peggy Utesch of the Grand Valley Citizens Alliance
will talk about experiences on the west slope and how they've effectively
dealt with similar issues
For the Baca Refuge, the fact that the federal government does not own
the mineral rights to all portions of the Refuge limits our ability
to completely regulate O&G operations. However, the Service has
several resources to provide adequate oversight to make sure that the
process is as environmentally friendly as we can make it. In addition,
we plan to continue enlisting as much expertise (both in house and out)
as we can to help us identify the best practices available and to help
with oversight. Realizing the sensitivities surrounding O&G activities
on a National Wildlife Refuge, and the fact that the Refuge is going
far beyond it's boundaries for input on the subject, Lexam has proven
thus far, to be willing to work with us on ensuring that the environment
and it's natural resources are adequately protected.
For more information on this proposed activity contact Ron Garcia, Refuge
Manager of the Baca National Wildlife Refuge at (719) 256-5527.
|
|
Volunteer!
Mark and Tracy Rawlings / Resident Volunteers, Baca NWR
In May of this year we were extremely fortunate to receive
a call from a volunteer couple who were looking for a place to set their
RV and call home for the summer in return for their services. With a
few modifications to an existing abandoned home site, we were able to
accommodate them near the old Baca Ranch headquarters site.
The couple (Mark and Tracey Rawlings) arrived on June 5th and were promptly
assigned the job of headquarters caretakers, which encompassed  everything
from maintenance of buildings and grounds, to office setup and providing
visitor information. Both quickly took on additional duties such as
fence removal to facilitate elk movement in the area, the design and
creation of a volunteer handbook for 
the refuge, and the design and creation of a visitor friendly bird &
plant ID book for all three refuges in the Complex.
When Mark realized how little the Refuge had, in terms of tools and
equipment, to carry out operation and maintenance of this large landscape
and all it contains, he set his sights on remedying the situation. In
the three months that the Rawlings have been at the Refuge Mark has
solicited donations of tools and supplies worth over $50,000 for the
Refuge. Mark has then used these (tools and supplies) to build everything
from shelving units to work benches and many other much needed items
for the Refuge.
During his stay at the Refuge, Mark has brought his total volunteer
time to over 4,000 hours with the Department of Interior, for which
he'll receive Presidential recognition.
Mark and Tracey have decided to move on for the winter and will be leaving
shortly after Labor Day. Their time spent on the Baca Refuge has been
truly appreciated and they know that because of their efforts they will
leave behind a Refuge much better prepared to take on the daunting task
of managing a landscape of over 70,000 acres with no appropriated funding.
The Rawlings will also leave knowing that the door is always open to
them on the Baca National Wildlife Refuge.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |